The opening day of the World Rapid Chess Championship in New York witnessed a rare and bizarre end to a game because of a unique chess rule. German Grandmaster Alexander Donchenko made a great escape just one move away from getting checkmated by World No. 3 Hikaru Nakamura of the USA, thanks to his ingenious use of the 50-move rule.

Nakamura had placed a check on Donchenko's King in the 128th move of their third-round meeting. Donchecko had only one available move: to block the check with his only remaining piece, a rook. But that would not have saved him because Nakamura could have captured that rook with his rook, resulting in a checkmate.

But then something bizarre happened. Donchenko stopped the clock and summoned the arbiter. He was claiming a draw by the 50-move rule. The arbiter came up with her notebook and verified that Donchenko was spot on, denying Nakamura a sure win and giving the German an unexpected draw.

nakamura-donchenko-game
GM Hikaru Nakamura (left). The position that appeared on board when Alexander Donchenko (black) claimed a draw.

What is 50-move rule?
According to the 50-move rule, a player can claim a draw if no one moves a pawn or captures a piece for 50 consecutive moves. Donchenko correctly remembered that the last capture (Rxa2, a rook capturing a pawn) occurred on move 78. So by the time, Nakamura played his Rh5+, giving a check, it was moved 128, precisely 50 moves later.

While the 50-move rule does come up occasionally in chess, even at the highest level, it is extremely rare to find a scenario like that between Nakamura and Donchenko. The rapid chess championship has a time control of 15 minutes per player with an increment of 10 seconds per move.

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Onmanorama. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.