Chennai: In a huge relief to the AIADMK government, the Madras High Court Thursday upheld the June 14 order of the then Chief Justice Indira Banerjee disqualifying its 18 rebel MLAs loyal to sidelined leader TTV Dhinakaran.
An adverse judgement could have triggered a political realignment in Tamil Nadu and brought the ruling party perilously close to losing majority in the state assembly whose effective strength is 232. Two seats are vacant.
The 18 AIADMK MLAs were disqualified on September 18, 2017, under the anti-defection law after they met the governor and expressed loss of confidence in Chief Minister E Palaniswami.
A division bench of the court comprising Banerjee and Justice M Sundar had delivered a split verdict on June 14. Banerjee had upheld Speaker P Dhanapal's order disqualifying them, while Sundar had passed a dissenting judgement.
The Supreme Court had then appointed Justice M Sathyanarayanan to hear the matter.
Justice Sathyanarayanan Thursday said there was no infirmity in Dhanapal's order which was upheld by Banerjee.
"All the material that were available at the time of passing of the order by the speaker alone have been taken into consideration and this court cannot go into the subsequent events," the judge observed, upholding the disqualification.
The judge said he had delivered his 'independent view' on the matter and not gone by those expressed by the two judges who heard it earlier.
Split judgment
In her 200-page June 14 order, Banerjee had upheld Dhanapal's decision.
Justice Sundar, in his 135-page judgement delivered separately, struck a dissenting note, insisting that Dhanapal's order 'deserved to be set aside'.
Banerjee had said the petitioners were given chance to present their case but they chose not to appear before the speaker, and as such, they cannot complain of breach of audi alteram partem (hear the other side) rule.
Justice Banerjee said she also found 'substance' in the contention of the government that if the effect of withdrawal of support and calling for initiation of constitutional process (against the chief minister) meant fall of the government, it would imply relinquishment of membership of the party, and attract provisions of the disqualification law.
Justice Sundar, however, said the entire controversy could have been put to rest had the speaker conceded the plea of the petitioners to allow them an opportunity for cross examination and give oral evidence. He had said that the speaker's order, even if legally correct, deserved to be set aside.
Relief for the Palaniswami
Thursday's verdict came as a massive relief for the Palaniswami government as the restoration of the membership of the rebel MLAs could have set off a realignment in the state's politics with the Dhinakaran camp likely joining hands with the opposition DMK and bringing it dangerously close to losing majority.
The DMK and its allies the Congress and IUML together have 97 MLAs, and with the 18 rebel AIADMK forging an alliance with them besides independent legislator Dhinakaran himself, their strength would have risen to 116, which is equal to that of the ruling party.
Two assembly seats are vacant, including Thiruvarur, which was represented by DMK patriarch the late M Karunanidhi.
Reacting to the verdict, Dhinakaran, who now heads the AMMK after being sidelined in the AIADMK, said he would consult the MLAs loyal to him before deciding whether to go in appeal in the Supreme Court.
"We expected a favourable verdict but it is not a setback. I will consult the 18 MLAs on whether to file an appeal in the Supreme Court. Personally, my feeling is we should go for byelections," he said.
Dhinakaran asserted his loyalists will sweep the bypolls. "The court's judgement is different and people's judgement is different," he said, claiming his party and those loyal to it will emerge stronger after the verdict.
Ther AIADMK hailed the judgement, calling it a 'just order'.
Party spokesperson P Valarmathi expressed joy over the verdict and said the Palaniswami government has now proved that it is 'stable'.
