The court gave the verdict on Friday on a plea filed by University syndicate member and MLA I B Satheesh, challenging the Chancellor's decision.

The court gave the verdict on Friday on a plea filed by University syndicate member and MLA I B Satheesh, challenging the Chancellor's decision.

The court gave the verdict on Friday on a plea filed by University syndicate member and MLA I B Satheesh, challenging the Chancellor's decision.

Kochi: The Kerala High Court on Saturday quashed the resolution made by State Governor Arif Mohammed Khan, suspending decisions of the syndicate and board of governors of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University. The Governor, as the Chancellor of the university, had recently suspended its syndicate decision to constitute a, "Syndicate Standing Committee on University Administrative Affairs".

It was constituted to give administrative support to the Vice-Chancellor and Registrar.

ADVERTISEMENT

Invoking his powers under Section 10(3) of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University Act, the Chancellor had also suspended the resolution of the Board of Governors, deferring the implementation of certain transfer orders of employees.

The court gave the verdict on Friday on a plea filed by University syndicate member and MLA I B Satheesh, challenging the Chancellor's decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

In its order, Justice Sathish Ninan observed that the proviso to Section 10(3) of the Act, in unambiguous terms, stipulates for an opportunity to show-cause "before making any such order."

"When the power is traced under a statutory provision, compliance in terms thereof is the mandate. Where the law prescribes a thing to be done in a particular manner and following a particular procedure, it shall be done in the same manner, following the provisions of law, without deviating from the prescribed procedure," it said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The statutory prescription of grant of opportunity to show-cause having not preceded the order, the same is liable to be interfered with, the court said.

"However, this shall be without prejudice to the right to proceed afresh in accordance with Section 10(3) of the Act," the court added.

(With inputs from PTI)